|Michigan St.||Big Ten||2||5|
|Texas Tech||Big 12||4||13|
|Kansas St.||Big 12||4||15|
|Iowa St.||Big 12||5||17|
|Seton Hall||Big East||8||31|
|St. John's (NY)||Big East||10||37|
|Saint Mary's (CA)||WCC||12||47|
|New Mexico St.||WAC||12||49|
|UC Irvine||Big West||12||50|
|Georgia State||Sun Belt||14||55|
|North Dakota State||Summit||16||64|
|Ohio St.||Big Ten||OUT||69|
Sunday, March 17, 2019
Posted by TD at 4:44 PM
Saturday, March 16, 2019
- Rhode Island, the 8 seed in the American Conference Tournament upset #1 Seed VCU. VCU was a lock before play began. With VCU out of the Conference Tournament, the AAC will have another bid with their conference winner, thus VCU losing shrunk the bubble by one line.
- Nevada, #1 seed in the Mountain West was also upset yesterday. San Diego State took out the Wolfpack and will play Utah State for the MWC Championship. I moved Utah State to a lock after their win over Fresno Stat. If I'm correct, SD State would steal a bid with a win
- Oregon advanced to the PAC12 Championship with a win over Arizona State in the Semi-Finals. Oregon will play Washington for the Championship, and may in the process steal a bid as well. I have Arizona State and Washington as locks ... not everyone does.
- I still have Virginia as the #1 overall seed despite their loss to Florida State yesterday, but not sure it will stand in the final scrub I do before selections are announced. Duke probably sowed up a #1 finally beating UNC with Williamson on the court. There appear to me to be 7 teams in contention for #1 Seeds. Still pretty fluid on the top 3 seed lines.
- I will be doing a full detailed scrub of the field after today's action and will produce a final seed list before tomorrow's selection show, so this could change. Some of my Quad and Net data is a bit stale.
My Quick Bid Math
- 60 of 68 Bids are now locked
- 12 Bids have been awarded to teams that have already won a Conference Tournament
- 11 Teams will be awarded the only bid their conference will get when their Tournament concluded
- 37 Teams have locked up At-Large Bids (Though 9 could still be awarded an auto-bid if they win their conference tournament
- 8 At-Large Bids Remain with 15 Teams in Contention for remaining 8 slots. Each Bid Thief will reduce the number of At-Large spots available by 1.
- Conferences that could still produce bid Thieves:
- MAC - If Buffalo loses to Bowling Green in Championship Game
- MWC - If Utah State loses to San Diego State in Championship Game (Assumes Utah State is a lock)
- PAC12 - If Washington loses to Oregon in in Championship Game (Assumes Arizona State is a lock)
- AMERICAN - If Memphis or Wichita State win Tournament. (Assumes Temple is in, and isn't squeezed out by other bid thieves)
Posted by TD at 8:50 AM
Friday, March 15, 2019
58 of the 68 Available Bids have been locked down, either through the awarding of automatic bids to teams that have already won their conference tournament, teams that will win the only bid their conference will get via the Auto-Bid to their conference tournament champion, or by teams who have already done enough to be awarded an at-large bid if they don't win their conference tournament.
Here is the Breakdown of the locks, as I see them:
Auto Bids Awarded (12)
Single Bid Conferences with Tournament Still Running (10)
Mid-Eastern Atlantic (MEAC)
Southwest Athletic (SWAC)
Teams who have locked up at least an At-Large Bid (36)
Note: Teams in Bold are currently the highest remaining seed in their conference tournament, which is still running
With 58 spots locked, 10 bids remain in play which sets the maximum size of the bubble
* It should be noted that the NCAA Selection Chair indicated that going into play yesterday, that actually 28 of the 38 At-Large bids had already been determined by the selection committee. I show more remaining because obviously, I don't who they have already selected.
Teams in Consideration for final 10 At-Large Bids (25 Bubble Teams)
Still playing (12) - All of these teams could also secure one of the remaining automatic bids by winning their conference tournament
Done Playing (13) - All of these teams have been eliminated from their respective conference tournaments and are at the mercy of those teams still playing.
Conference Tournaments that Could Still Produce Bid Thieves
Atlantic 10 (A10) - VCU is a lock. No other team aside from Davidson, and extreme longshot for an At-Large bid remains in consideration. If VCU loses, the A10 Tournament Champ will steal a bid
Mid-American (MAC) - Buffalo is a lock. They are heavy favorites to win the Conference Tournament, and the only other team that was on the fringe of the bubble (Toledo) was eliminated yesterday. As with VCU in the A10, a Buffalo loss will produce a bid stealing MAC Champ.
Mountain West (MWC) - The MWC conference has one lock (Nevada) and one near lock (Utah State). Should anyone besides these two teams with the MWC Tourney, it is likely to produce a bid thief. If Utah State doesn't make the Championship game though, I think they will be sweating it come the Selection Show on Sunday.
PAC 12 - I have Washington and Arizona State as locks. Not everyone is sold on Arizona State though. If I'm right, and neither win the tournament, I think the PAC 12 will produce a 3rd bid and steal a spot from the open bubble slots. I actually like Oregon, who plays Arizona State today in a fascinating game, to win the PAC12.
American Athletic (AAC) - Were entering 'far-fetched' territory here, but one could envision a scenario where the AAC produces a thief. Houston, Cincinnati and UCF are locks on my board. Temple is in the field on my board, but dangerously close to the cut line. However, if things break right and either Memphis (a long shot for an at-large) and Wichita State are still alive in the AAC Tourney. If everything breaks just right, and Wichita State were to wind up facing and beating Temple in the Championship game, its possible Temple could hold on for an at-large. This scenario could produce a 5th bid for the American.
Big Ten (B10) - This is the most far-fetched scenario of all, so much so that it seems to be a waste to spend time discussing it, but it is fascinating to consider. The B10 has locks on my board with Michigan State, Michigan, Purdue, Wisconsin, Maryland, Iowa and Minnesota. Six of those 7 teams are among the 8 remaining in the tournament Quarterfinals. Ohio State, like Temple in the AAC, is near the cut line and could be a victim of thieves from other conferences, or being surpassed by teams below them continuing to win. However, they play Michigan State today and might very well lock down a bid with a win, giving the B10 8 locked bids. The scenario for a 9th rests with Nebraska. They are a long shot for a bubble bid as well (Though a win over Wisconsin and Michigan to get the Championship game will make them a hot bubble topic heading into play Sunday). Should Ohio State win today, and Nebraska go on to win the tournament, I think the Big 10 winds up with 9 bids, It's hard to envision it happening. Nebraska, playing in this tournament with only 7 scholarship players, would have to win 5 games in 5 days for that to happen. That path would include Maryland (who they beat yesterday), Wisconsin, Michigan or Iowa, and likely Michigan State or Purdue. It would be miraculous if they did it.
I suspect we'll see two bid thieves emerge from the conference tournaments listed above. Assuming that is the case the bubble shrinks from 10 spots to 8 for the 25 teams listed as being on the bubble.
Right now my "Last 4 In" are Alabama, Ohio State, TCU and Florida. All but TCU have games today leaving TCU as most vulnerable, either to being squeezed out by a bid thief, or being run down from behind by a team not in the field that is still alive. They have no control of their own destiny
My 'First Four Out' are Texas, Georgetown, NC State and Indiana. All four of these teams are done playing, and if I'm correct, need to hope for multiple teams near the cut line above them to lose, no bid thieves to emerge, and the bubble teams below still playing to lose today.
Posted by TD at 10:58 AM
Thursday, March 14, 2019
The NC State/Clemson game yesterday left fans of both teams a little salty. Clemson fans saw their team blow an 18 point lead and lose on a couple of last second free throws on a foul call that Tiger fans weren't particularly thrilled about. NC State fans were feeling pretty good about their Wolfpack for a couple minutes until Joe Lunardi took to the airwaves and basically said that despite the win, NC State didn't look like a tournament team to him, and that they would be very lucky to make it in when all is said and done. Seth Davis tweeted not long after that he felt NC State still needed to win two more games to earn an At-Large bid. NC State fans thought they just earned a tournament bid ... but some Analyst guys started crapping on that parade. I can't say I blame them for being a bit defensive.
Now, I'm no fan of Lunardi, but in this case I agree with him, and at least partially with Davis. I don't have NC State in even with yesterday's win. Should they upset Virginia today it likely would be enough to move them in, but it would be close, particularly if teams ahead of them also win and the bubble shrinks due to bid thieves stealing some of the current at-large bids being competed for by the likes of NC State. They very well may need to win more than just today's game. Time will tell on that, and frankly, its not worth worrying about until they actually beat Virginia. If they do, it will be the first team in the Quad 1a grouping they have beaten all year. I stated my agreement publicly and gave my reasoning. A big part of that argument is pinned to that winless record against the Quad 1a grouping despite 8 opportunities to date to win one. A number of people challenged me that such a grouping even exists.
Many of you may be thinking the same thing. No one on TV is talking about Quad 1a. They never show that record on TV when showing team resumes. It sounds like something someone made up, and it was suggested I did just that. But I assure you the grouping is real, it is data that is being provided every day to the NCAA Selection Committee by the NCAA itself, and most importantly, it was data specifically requested by the Selection Committee itself last summer. No one on TV may be talking about it, but you can bet it is in the Selection meetings, which began yesterday.
What is Quad 1a?
Most who follow college basketball have become familiar with Quad records. The NCAA started using them last year to help group each team's wins an losses into common 'levels of difficulty' for lack of a better term. The better the team, the better of the quality of victory. Quality was determined by the opponent, and where you played them. Last season the quality of the team was determined by the Ratings Percentage Index, or RPI. The RPI has been scrapped and replaced by a new ranking system called the NCAA Evaluation Tool, or NET. NET rankings are used to define the Quads. Here is how Quads are set up:
A game played against a NET ranked team ranked 70th at their gym, would count as a Quad 1 win. However, beat that same team on your home floor or at a Neutral Site, and it only counts as a Quad 2 win. Not all wins against the same team are created equal in most cases. Its all about where you play them.
As a macro tool for getting a high level view of how a team performed against various qualities of competition it serves the purpose. It aids the selection committee in doing an initial scrub of all the teams to try and identify those that have fared better or worse than other teams. It's really pretty simple. If I'm looking at two teams who both have 20-10 records, how do I sort who has performed better than the other. A good start would be to look at their records against the best competition. A team that had 8 Quad 1 wins among the 20 total they have would initially be sorted higher than a 20 win team with 1 Quad win.
The problem comes in when those two teams both have 8 Quad 1 wins. Are all Quad 1 wins created equal? The logical answer is, of course not, unless of course you believe that beating Virginia, ranked 1 is truly as impressive as beating Penn State (49) on a Neutral Court or Liberty (60) on their home floor. The NCAA, in response to this quandary, started providing a break down of wins in the Quad 1 and Quad 2 groupings into 2 tiers per Quad, commonly referred to as Quad 1a, Quad 1b, Quad 2a and Quad 2b. The data is designed to help the committee see which Quad 1 or Quad 2 games were against the top half of the Quad or bottom half of that Quad. Here is how those groupings are further broken down within their respective Quads.
Using this further slicing of a data, a Game won against a team ranked 24th would be a Quad 1b win, but a Quad 1a win on a nuetral or road court. They are both Quad 1 wins at the Macro level, but the win on a nuetral or road court is ranked higher. Back to our example of the two teams with 20 wins, and 8 Quad 1 wins each. If you break them down further into Quad 1a and 1b games and find that of the 8 Quad 1 wins, Team A has, 6 are in the 1a grouping and Team B has just 1 in that same grouping, the committee members likely would conclude that Team A should be ranked higher than B for selection purposes. Obviously this is a simplistic view, and there are other factors they consider, but it does seem rather obvious to me that this kind of a break down helps the committee do better side by side comparisons of two teams who may otherwise look similar on paper looking at only the Quad 1 totals.
Some may be wondering where the committee gets this data from ... or even if they truly get it, since none of the talking heads on TV reference it. The data is provided by the NCAA on what are known as team sheets. These are used heavily by the committee. It provides a summarized view of each team, and includes a bunch of information about each team including summarized Quad1 thorugh Quad 4 records. Those summaries don't include the records for the a and b tiers in Quad 1 or 2. However, they do list, by Quad, each team that they have played, the NET ranking of the opponent, where the game was played and the outcome. It is here that the data is provided. Let's take a look at NC State's team sheet as of this morning (3/14):
Looking at the Quad 1 games column you will see the games broken into two groups. The criteria for the groups in Quad 1 are circled in red and highlighted in yellow. For Quad 2, circled in blue and highlighted. As you can see, the data is clearly provided to give a view to the reader of how the team performed in the top half and bottom half of each Quad. In this case, NC State is 0-8 against Quad 1a, and 3-0 vs. Quad 1b. They are 3-0 in each half of the Quad 2 tiers.
So, how do we know this data is important and not just window dressing? Because the committee specifically requested it be included this season. This was not data that was provided last year. Clearly the committee felt it would be useful and was needed in their process of sorting, selecting and seeding teams. If just looking at the Quad 1 or 2 records provided all they needed last year for those purposes, there would have been no need to request it. The only conclusion I can reach is that they asked for it because they intend to use it. It's overall weight is anyone's guess at this point. But to pretend it's not there at all is to ignore the obvious. To pretend people would like at Quad 1 records, but not at what games made up that record when the data is specifically presented to show it, defies logic.
And how do I know that the committee specifically asked for it? Because I was told so by David Warlock, the NCAA Director of Media Coordination/Statistics and Media Coordinator for March Madness. He sits in the room as the committee goes through the selection process and started his 14th year of doing it yesterday.
So yes, there really is Quad1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b data provided to the selection committee by the NCAA. It was provided at their request. And frankly, if you don't think they intend to use it, I think you're foolish (or engaging in wishful thinking).
What does this have to do with NC State?
We now return to what prompted this whole discussion in the first place. Is NC State currently a team that can be expected to be in the NCAA Tournament as an At-Large or not? Lunardi says yes for now ... Seth Davis says not unless they win a couple more ... and I say no, and I doubt they will get there unless they beat Virginia today ... and then probably, but its not a lock.
Let's do a compare of 4 Teams generally considered to be very close to the bubble cut line by most ... NC State, Ohio State, TCU and Georgetown. I choose them because they come from 4 different conferences and have easy to compare profiles. This provides an opportunity to see how the Quad data and NET data, and specifically with a and b data sliced up within it, would or could be used to evaluate the 4 teams.
If you were to look at NET rating and overall record alone, you would likely be inclined to rank them in order left to right. A deeper dive into the data, I would argue, tells a very different story.
I tend to think these are the metrics the committee will likely look at first for sorting and selecting. By my analysis, NC State stacks up worst in almost every measurment compared to the other three.
- Quad 1 - Worst (Tied)
- Quad 1a - Worst
- Quad 1a Road/Neutral - Worst
- Quad 1-2a - 2nd
- Quad 1-2a Road/Neutral - Worst
- Best Win - I would argue worst. Better ranking but at home. I agree its debatable
- Best Road/Neutral Win - Worst
- Quad 3-4 Record - 3rd
- Worst over all loss of each team, and the worst home loss.
- Compared to the teams currently in the field or on the bubble, they have the worst record.
Reasonable people can disagree if these metrics are key, and if the conclusion I have reached from evaluating them is correct. In my book, its not close. They just aren't an NCAA Tournament team this year. Historically we know this much, and its been consistent over the years;
- The committee puts a high value on Road wins against the best competition.
- The committee penalizes marginal bubble teams that have played awful non-conference schedules. It happens every year. There isn't a worse non-conference schedule in all of the NCAA then the one the Wolfpack played. As bad as Georgetown's is ... NC State's is over a hundred spots worse.
- A well known record the committee looks at in its final bubble scrub is the record of the team versus those in or on the bubble. I agree its subjective, and fluid, especially right now, so its not a major factor yet. We also don't know who the Committee considers a bubble team, and my bubble may be different than theirs. As teams win Tournaments and teams come into or fall out of the field it can change by selection Sunday. But today, I believe they have a miserable record against those teams. Even if I give them credit for Clemson (I believe they are no longer under consideration so I didn't count them in the record above) the 4-8 record becomes only a fraction better than OSU.
For the record, the way I have these teams ranked relative to one another is:
- Georgetown (IN) -
- TCU (OUT)
- Ohio State (OUT)
- NC State (OUT)
The only thing that could potentially keep NC State in the discussion if they lose today, in my opinion, is their NET rating. Its's possible the committee could ignore the actual results of the games every team has played and value the NET rating above the actual results of games. If that happens, all bets are off. But the NCAA has stated that the NET Ranking is sorting tool. The Quads are a selection tool. That statement alone tells me that game outcomes will trump a rating, as it should.
Posted by TD at 9:32 AM
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
We got our first bona fide thief last night with St. Mary's upset of Gonzaga in the West Coast Conference Tournament. Murray State may, or may not have been the first when they knocked off Belmont in the Ohio Valley over the weekend. We won't know for sure on that one until selection Sunday. If Belmont gets in, we will have our answer. It may be just as likely, that St. Mary's stole Belmont's bid last night. The collective groan from Raleigh to Phoenix as the clock expired in the WCC Championship game could be heard across the College Basketball landscape.
Looking ahead at the remaining 21 Conference Tournaments who will dole out auto bids this week, here are the remaining tournaments to watch if you're hunting for more bid thieves.
These are Mid-Major conferences with 1 Team who enters Championship Week as conference leader, but whom would safely be selected as an at large team if they failed to win their Conference Tournament
- Mid-American Conference (MAC) - Buffalo enters post season play as the MAC leader and favorite to win the MAC tourney. They currently rank as a #5 Seed on my projection, and are a consensus 6 at bracketmatrix.com. No doubt they are a lock for the tourney no matter what happens to them, but no other MAC teams are on the bubble. This is a very competitive conference, with some quality challengers for the Bulls to navigate through. Buffalo enters play tomorrow in the Quaterfinal round facing Akron, who the Bulls have beaten twice including by 6 at Akron. Buffalo has lost just 2 conference games this season, to Bowling Green and Northern Illinois. Toledo is a very good team that have the players to compete with them as well. All three teams reside in the other half of the bracket from Buffalo, so they only will have to navigate through one of them, which would be in the Championship game.
- Atlantic 10 Conference (A10) - The Atlantic 10 leaders VCU cruised to a 16-2 record to win the regular season title. They also have been playing particularly good basketball of late, having won 12 in a row by an average of almost 18 points a game. Are they due for a let down? VCU gets the advantage of a double bye, so they will have time to rest while their first game opponents are slogging out games to get to them. VCU will not play until Friday, but could get Rhode Island, the last team to beat VCU this season. However, VCU avenged that loss with a 76-42 thrashing or URI back in February. Perhaps the teams that present the greatest threats to VCU are Davidson, who beat the Rams in their only match-up in the regular season, and Dayton, who played VCU to within 1 and 5 points in their regular season contests. If they are to face ether of those teams, it would have to be in the A10 Champtionship on Sunday.
This represents any conference which currently have a conference leader who would safely qualify as an at-large and 2 or more teams that are in good position to qualify for at-large bids if a team not considered in the field today were to win the conference tournament. In this situation, the current conference leaders AND the teams currently considered at large qualifiers would both have to lose. In some cases those at-large teams are close enough to the cut line though, that a loss might mean it's there bid get stolen.
- PAC 12 - The current conference leader is Washington, and are a lock for an at-large bid if they fail to win the automatic bid this weekend. Arizona State is a dicier situation. I have them as a 9 seed, and even with a bad early loss would still be in on my board. Bracket Matrix shows them as a consensus 11 seed, meaning they are dangerously close to the cut line. Quite honestly just about any loss in the PAC 12 tourney for Arizona State, aside from a loss to Washington is going to be damaging. In order to feel confident that the PAC 12 could produce a bid thief, you need to hope for an early exit by Washington and for Arizona State to get to the Championship game and lose. That wold mean someone like Oregon State or Colorado winning 3 straight. It's not very likely. It's possible Oregon could do it on Arizona State's half of the bracket. A Semi-Final loss by Arizona State to Oregon might not be fatal to them. I think Oregon is actually a real threat to win this tournament. But if they do, it could very well be at the expense of a bid for the Sun Devils, especially if the Bracket Matrix consensus is a better projection of how they are seen by the committee than mine is. If you're going hunting in this conference, Ducks are the game of choice.
- Mountain West Conference (MWC) - A very similar situation to the PAC-12 sets up in the MWC. Nevada is safely in, but like Washington, vulnerable. Utah State is in, but in tenous position near the bubble cut-line. Bracketmatrix shows Utah State safer than Arizona State, so if that consensus is correct, they may be safer than Arizona State should they both lose. There are some dangerous teams in this conference, and this tournament is notorious for producing surprise winners. I like Fresno State as a possible thief out of the MWC.
- American Association Conference (AAC) - Things really starting getting complicated here. Bottom line - Houston, Cincinnati and UCF look safe for an at-large if they all lose. Temple probably needs to beat one of these teams to feel better about its chances. However, for a thief to emerge from this conference, someone other than one of those four teams has to win it all ... and that is difficult to envision happening. If you want to hunt for a thief here, keep your eye on Memphis. If they were to play Temple for the A10 title and win a tight one, the Tigers could steal a bid, while Temple and the other 3 AAC teams currently projected in the field stay safe.
In all, 5 potential bid thieves lurk out there. I put the over/under for number that will actually get the job done at 2. Nothing would make me happier Championship week than to see at least 3 do it.
Posted by TD at 9:55 AM
At least one team's bubble popped last night following Saint Mary's impressive bid stealing win in the West Coast Conference Championship over Gonzaga. Despite Dickie V's repeated claims that Saint Mary's was a bubble team that should get in even if they lost last night, the reality was, Saint Mary's had zero chance of getting an at-large bid without that win. By winning though, and grabbing a second bid for the West Coast Conference, one less At-Large spot is now available for the rest of the field. By adding Saint Mary's to it ... somebody has to be dropped. We likely will never know who that team was (The NCAA doesn't tell us how teams outside the field were ranked), but we'll have a pretty good idea from who doesn't make it who the probable victims may have been.
In my current seed list, it was TCU that got dropped out of the field. That creates ripples in both directions on the bubble as well. I have Texas losing a first round bye, and now having to go to Dayton to take on Alabama in a play-in game. Oklahoma gets a spot closer to the cut line too, dropping into the grouping of 'Last 4 Byes'.
Going the other way, I have now taken Xavier out of consideration. Even if they make Big East Championship beating Creighton and Villanova, but fail to win it, I just don't see that being enough to get them over the cut line. NC State, Clemson and Florida now have the much more work to do, as the cut line moves up. Plenty of other teams are no doubt lamenting the Gael's victory last night as well.
Gonzaga would have locked down a #1 Seed with a win last night. By losing, they have left the door wide open to fall off the top line, if they haven't already. I have long thought that Gonzaga was safe on the 1 line unless they lost in the WCC tournament. If that happened, an incredibly soft schedule for the last 3 months would expose the Zags soft underbelly. The resume just isn't #1 Seed Quality. If any other team had one like it not named Gonzaga, we'd be talking about them as a 3 Seed. Come to think of it, we do have a team like that not named Gonzaga who is projected by many as a 3, and in some cases 4 ... it's Houston. Check out the side by side of them compare below:
The difference between these two teams is razor thin, and depending on what you place the most value you on, you could make a case for putting either one ahead of the other. What no one is talking about though is Houston as a #1 Seed, nor should they. This fact alone I believe proves the point. Gonzaga is being overvalued this morning in the wake of the loss last night. Yet, the talking heads like Lunardi insist Gonzaga is still a #1, and you're overreacting to one loss if you think otherwise. I think Seth Davis has it right. They're probably still a #1 this morning, but now exposed, and vulnerable to multiple teams passing them.
In my perfect world, where I'm the only one picking the field, Gonzaga is a high 3 Seed. However, I'm not and my goal is to figure out what the Committee is thinking. My assumption at this point is that Gonzaga probably still sits on the 1 line this morning with them. But as the week progresses, and the teams just below them build their resumes in the Conference Tournaments, Gonzaga will get overtaken. Duke, Kentucky (and/or Tennessee), and Michigan State almost certainly will pass them with Conference Tournament Championships. A more objective analysis would put them in jeopardy of falling behind Houston and Texas Tech should they win out as well. I'm not confident that the committee would be willing to move either of those teams (or LSU for that matter, should they win the SEC) ahead of the Zags.
- Northeastern - Colonial Conference
- Northern Kentucky - Horizon League
- Fairleigh Dickinson - Northeast Conference
- North Dakota State - Summit League
- Saint Mary's - West Coast Conference
An interesting factoid from last night ... None of the 5 teams who won their conference tournaments entered it as the #1 Seed. In fact, of the 11 bids clinched so far, only 2 of them were #1 seeds in their respective conference tournaments (Wofford & Iona).
Posted by TD at 7:35 AM
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
What makes these tournaments so compelling is that they are played between teams that know each other extremely well. In many cases these teams are facing off for the 3rd time in the last 2-3 months, and that kind of familiarity often leads to tightly contested games and unpredictable results, and in about 90% of the games, the end of the season for the losing team hanging in the balance. You also get an opportunity, especially when watching games in the small and mid-major conference tournaments, to watch terrific players you likely never have heard of, and if you have, may never before have had much of a chance to watch them play an entire game, instead of just highlights. Finally, the drama of watching a long shot team who may not have had a very good regular season come together and make an inspired 3-4 game string of wins to punch an unexpected ticket to the tournament makes for great sports watching.
On Saturday, those that happened to tune into the Ohio Valley Conference Championship game saw an epic match-up between the two best teams in that conference, Belmont and Murray State, clash for the 2nd time this year. Murray State rode their star Ja Morant, and his 36 points, to an upset of the Bears, who had beaten them at Murray State earlier in the year. Murray State is now in the tournament, something that was likely out of the question had they lost. Belmont, following a terrific season, sits on the bubble sweating to see if the committee will put them in. On Sunday, Gardner-Webb, a 4th seed in the Big South conference tournament ran the tournament table concuding with a win in the Championship game to secure the first NCAA Bid in history for the school. Watching the pure joy of those players and their fans as they secured the victory was stirring. College Basketball fans get 30 more bites at that apple this week before the NCAA Selection Show on Sunday evening.
- Ohio Valley Conference - Murray State
- Big South - Gardner-Webb
- Missouri Valley - Bradley
- Atlantic Sun - Liberty
- Southern - Wofford
- Metro Atlantic (MAAC) - Iona
Championships Tonight - Tuesday, March 12 (Seeds included)
- Colonial Conference - Hofstra (1) vs. Northeastern (2) - 6:00 PM on CBS Sports Network
- Horizon League - Wright State (1) vs. Northern Kentucky (2) - 6:00 PM on ESPN
- Northeast Conference - Saint Francis (1) vs. Farleigh Dickinson (2) - 6:00 PM on ESPN2
- Summit League - North Dakota State (4) vs Omaha (2) - 8:00 PM on ESPN2
- West Coast - Gonzaga (1) vs. Saint Mary's (2) - 8:00 PM on ESPN
Quick definition here for those that may be unfamiliar with the term. A bid thief is a team that has no chance to be selected to the tournament field as an at-large team, which instead clinches an auto-bid by winning the conference tournament. To make them a thief they must play in a conference with at least one team that is sure to get an at-large bid. They are referred to as thieves, because in denying a certain at-large team an auto-bid, the at-large field essentially shrinks and teams on the edge of the bubble now have one less at-large bid available. Thus the unlikely conference champion is said to have stolen a bid from a bubble team.
Murray State, who would never have gotten in as an at-large. earned an auto bid Sunday. Belmont. may or may not get selected as an At-Large. If they do (and right now I have them in), Murray State will have become this year's first bid thief. Belmont will be a close call on Selection Sunday, in the end, Murray State may well have stolen the bid from Belmont.
Several tournaments present opportunities for bid thieves to emerge. Of the 5 games being played tonight. one holds the potential.
West Coast Conference - Gonzaga(1) vs. Saint Mary's(2) - Gonzaga is obviously in, and probably looking at a #1 seed regardless of whether they win tonight or not. St. Mary's spent a lot of time on the bubble, and some still have them on it thanks in part to a strong NET. I don't see the wins there to justify their inclusion. If they win, the WCC will get a second team in with Saint Mary's ... Fans of Indiana, TCU, Ohio State, Clemson, Texas and others who may fear their team is currently holding the last spot on the bubble will be rooting hard for Gonzaga ... I'll be pulling for thievery!
Posted by TD at 6:20 AM